Bosnia an Herzegovina: OUST SCHMIDT AND CANCEL INZKO'S "LAW"
TO UN SC: INZKOS ACCUSATIONS AGAINST SERBS ARE BASELESS
Comment submitted to the UN SC, contesting the unfounded accusations
Has Montenegro been blackmailed:
- verdict for genocide or secession from Serbia
- accusing Serbia and Serbs of genocide or ousting the minister Leposavić...?
Reaction to Biden's "letter of congratulations" regarding Serbian Statehood Day
Letter referring to Inzko's (OHR) accusation, that all Serbs are collectively guilty
Letter to the German Federal Cabinet and the Ministry of Foreig Affairs concerning Christian SCHMIDT's candidacz for the position of the High Representative in BiH
Letter to the UN Security Council ► with analysis of legal issues concerning activity of the OHR/PIC in Bosnia and Herzegovina
Letter to the OHR (Inzko) ► case Srebrenica: NO VERDICT - NO GENOCIDE
(legal issues and flaws of the proceedings, incompetent court, declassified exculpatory evidence from the UK, missing facts, liability for crimes against peace not prosecuted, no prosecution of worse atrocities against Serbian civilians)
Letter to the OHR (Inzko) ► containing legal analysis of inadmissibility of court proceedings, instuteted upon claim filed in 1993 by of the Izetbegović's part of BiH against FRY with International Court of Justice, because "genocide" and other legal and logical absurds
(lack of legal qualification, "genocidal intent" and other elements, controversial interpretations of the lack of the capacity to sue and to be sued in ICJ decisions handling analog cases: claims of the FRY basing on NATO aggression and a part of BiH - without consent of its constituent people against FRY, contradictions ratione temporis regarding the moment of filing the claim, vacuum till "incrimination" grounds are created, incompetence and returning the judgment against non-existing respndent)
Initiative filed with the Constitutional Court of Montenegro ► to assess constitutionality and compliance with the ratified international agreements of the Montenegrin LAW ON FREEDOM OF RELIGION OR BELIEFS AND LEGAL STATUS OF RELIGIOUS COMMUNITIES
(the law was passed during Christmas Holidays, at 2:30 AM, to enter into force on the orthodox Christmas, under massive police presence and placing other opposition MPs under arrest regardless of their immunity; the law practically seized the property of the Serbian Orthodox Church, being the most important religious community and excludes the very basic legal institutes and guaranteed civil rights, and revises the history; after law was passed, massive and peaceful protests of believers followed, and that caused the ruling party to lose elections)
- 13.01.2020: Reaction to so called "Appeal 88"
Following the motion filed by the Foundation, the Constitutional Court ruled, that the cited Decision was unconstitutional.