Acting on application of BiH against Serbia and Montenegro for genocide - the International Court of Justice passed a Judgment in 2007, which determined that Serbia did not commit genocide , but did not decide on the fate of the lawsuit for genocide against Montenegro.
According to the records of the International Court of Justice, at the hearing held on April 24, 2006. The Government of Bosnia and Herzegovina requested the Court to rule and find that Serbia and Montenegro, through its organs or bodies under its control, had violated its obligations under the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide by deliberately and partially destroying Non-Serb religious groups within, but also outside the territory of BiH , including in particular Muslim population ...
However, in the following month of May - on the basis of lex specialis, the Law on the Referendum on State and Legal Status and with the help of Miroslav Lajcak, special envoy Xavier Solana (High Representative for Foreign and Security Policy of the EU) and Frantisek Lipka (independent chairman of the Montenegrin Referendum Commission) a referendum was held on the independence of Montenegro. With a difference of about 2400 votes and by virtue of the unconstitutional parliamentary Decision on the Declaration of Independence of June 3rd, 2006 Montenegro became independent, and in the following month (June 28th, 2006), the UN General Assembly passed a Resolution on the admission of Montenegro as the 192nd member. Fourteen years from the filing of the lawsuit or eight months after the separation from Serbia, the International Court of Justice 26.2.2007. brought JUDGMENT no. 91 establishing that Serbia did not commit genocide, without stating the reasons, why it did not decide on the accusation of Montenegro of genocide.
As their is no statute of limitation for genocide - with the wholehearted help of the American, British and German embassies - the Government and "grilled" Montenegrin stete officials are asked to accuse Serbia and Serbs of genocide. At the same time, in order to avoid reviewing or debating the legality of decisions of interim and other international tribunals, there are demands to the Government to urgently enact a law banning genocide denial.
Democracy Development Foundation